http://bythesea.makingsense.com/102.php He had resigned from his county post the previous fall with three months pay and has consistently maintained he is innocent of the accusations. But delays by top county officials in referring the case to the district attorney, as well as an internal investigation and another from the county grand jury, indicate more might have been known about complaints against Bustamante than county officials have publicly acknowledged.
Public Works Director Jess Carbajal was fired. Normally, the county would argue as part of its case the reasons records, if any, should remain private, said Aviles. Instead, the county waited nearly a year until the civil case, assigned to Judge David McEachen, was about to go to trial.
Then in an unusual move, the county turned to the criminal courts and Judge Gregg Prickett, who was presiding over the Bustamante sexual assault case. The county asked Prickett for an order that would bar the county from making the records public. One of the three justices, Raymond J.
Ikola, wrote that he would have vacated the criminal court ruling and ordered the civil court to decide the case. Share on facebook. Share on twitter.
Share on linkedin. Share on email. Share on print. Prev Previous California state senator wants live broadcasts for key state school finance meetings. Next Federal court rules comments on public website not private Next.
Rather, I was told that the investigation was sparked by allegations made by a former employee. All meetings of boards and commissions open. There is a opinion by the California Attorney General, which concludes the exemption does not encompass the Claims Act claim form [62 Cal. If upheld by the appellate courts, the judgment would radically alter the contours of the Public Records Act in California. The obstacles noted by petitioners and the League—the legal and practical impediments attendant to the extra task of policing private devices and accounts would also be addressed more appropriately by the Legislature or the agency, not the courts. It also said that as a result of the investigation, changes had been made to department policies.
Subscribe to fac news updates. First Name.
Last Name. Major Support Provided By:.
The guide contains a full topical index and table of authorities and a listing of all records retention and destruction statutes. It is written by Terry Francke, general counsel for the nonprofit public interest organization Californians Aware, with more than 30 years of experience helping journalists, citizen watchdogs, attorneys and even government officials and employees understand the open government laws.
Brown Act local government councils, boards and commissions , with parallel coverage of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act state government councils, boards and commissions as well as special rules for meetings of the state legislature, the California Judicial Council, the Commissions on Judicial Appointments and Judicial Performance, the University of California Board of Regents, the Board of Governors of the State Bar, Student Government Bodies at California State University campuses, local school site Parent Advisory Committees, Homeowners Association Governing Boards, and locally adopted sunshine ordinances.
This comprehensive guide to all California law providing or restricting access to government and judicial records focuses on the California Public Records Act. Annotated legal guide to the citizen's right of access to public records and to private information protection in California.
The guide analyzes each statutory provision as well as its interpretive case law and attorney general's opinions-current through September and includes the full text of each statute and court rule. Issues addressed for the Brown and Bagley-Keene Acts include the definition of key terms, the requirements for meetings, the rights of the public, exceptions from the open meeting requirement, dealing with violations without going to court, and legal remedies and litigation strategy, including sample letters to challenge violations of these open meeting laws.
The guide is written by Terry Francke, general counsel for the nonprofit public interest organization Californians Aware, with more than 35 years of experience helping journalists, citizen watchdogs, attorneys and even government officials and employees understand the open government laws.
A chapter on the rights of high school and college journalists covers California laws providing freedom from censorship and punitive discipline, as well as access to crime records at colleges and universities. Bibliographical references and appendices are attached.
Format: Handbook. This textbook, both dated and out of print, still provides a valuable context for California media law. In each area of mass media law, the authors briefly summarize nationwide principles in order to place California law in perspective. The table of contents must be used to offset the rather skimpy index.